
Erin Carlisle
HYROX Birmingham 2026 · Doubles Women · 25-29 · GBR
NEC Birmingham · Birmingham · 2026-03-07
55:24
7th of 524 in Doubles Women · 1st in 25-29 · faster than 99% of the field
Overview
Where this race sits in Doubles Women, station by station.
55:24
29:31
−10:46
21:39
−10:00
4:14
−0:55
- Overall standard
- 99% percentile
- Strongest
- Sled Push100% percentile
- Weakest
- Wall Balls93% percentile
- Division rank
- 7th of 524
- Age group
- 1st in 25-29
The story of your race
Where the finish time was won and lost, checkpoint by checkpoint.

Every station against your own standard
You raced at the 99% percentile overall. These bands show what someone of that standard typically runs on each station — so a split above the middle band is a strength, and one below it is where your time is going.
- Excellent
- Great
- Expected
- Below par
- Off day
What this race was worth on the same legs
Your best station on the day was Sled Push, at the 100th percentile. If every other station had matched that same level — on the same day, on the same legs — this is where you would have finished.
55:24
52:18
3:06
Where it is
- Wall Balls1:06
- Burpee Broad Jump0:45
- SkiErg0:23
- Row0:23
- Sled Pull0:22
Running assessment
How evenly you ran, and what the back half cost you.
29:31
1.3%
Excellent
3:41
runs 2–7
0:03
back four vs front four
The roxzone
The part of the race nobody trains, and the cheapest time on this sheet.
4:14
5:09
−0:55
7.6%
Against the winner of Doubles Women
Nadia Watson won this division in 54:38. This is where the gap actually is — it is rarely spread evenly.

Against your last race
Nothing to compare yet — this is the first race we hold for you in this division.
What your next race looks like
Based on two races. Two points make a line but not a trend — this sharpens once you have three.
53:01
−2:23
55:49
+0:25
58:38
+3:14
1:01:27
+6:03
1:04:15
+8:51
Based on two races, so this is a range around your current time rather than a trend. It sharpens considerably at three.
Your race history
Every Doubles Women race we hold for you. Darker means faster within that column.
| Race | Finish | Run total | Stations | Roxzone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham 2026 | 55:24 | 29:31 | 21:39 | 4:14 |
| Manchester 2026 | 58:38 | — | — | — |
Split detail is shown for the races loaded in full. Open any race from your profile to add it here.
How every figure here was worked out
No black box. If you cannot check a number, you cannot train against it.
- Percentiles
- Computed against every finisher in Doubles Women at this event — 524 times for the overall figure, and the full division sample for each station.
- Performance bands
- Your overall percentile is read back against each station’s own distribution. The middle band is what an athlete of your standard typically posts there; the others are the same distribution read further up and down. Shifting in percentile space rather than in seconds matters, because ten points is worth far more time on the sled than on the ski erg.
- Same-day potential
- Your strongest station sets the ceiling, and every other station is measured against that same percentile. It is deliberately not “if you were perfect” — you proved you could operate at that level on the day, so it is a target rather than a fantasy.
- The race story
- At each checkpoint: time actually elapsed, plus the division average for everything still to come. Your roxzone is spread evenly across the sixteen timed segments, which is why the line lands exactly on your finish time.
- Next race
- A least-squares line through your finish times in this division, extrapolated one race forward. The band width is your own residual spread, not a population figure.
- What is not here
- Per-transition roxzone splits, because the timing feed publishes one roxzone total rather than eight. Where a benchmark says “winner” it is the winner’s split, not the fastest split in the field — we do not hold per-segment records for every finisher.